In the Beginning

In the Beginning

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.

 The general theory of relativity, science’s prevailing model for describing the origin of the universe, describes an initial singularity, which contained all the mass, energy, space and time of the universe, compressed into an infinitely dense, small point. Then, at the moment of creation (the beginning of space and time) that initial singularity, expanded exponentially. Everything in the universe, from the farthest star, to the recliner I am sitting in, came from that initial singularity.

I have always thought that this description of the origin of the universe had an elegant symmetry with Genesis 1:1, where, we are told that out of nothing, God created everything. That initial singularity, was God Himself, which means the entire universe came out of Him and that He is necessarily both above all and in all. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together (Col. 1:17).

I tend to think that God exists in all things, but according to today’s passage, it is more accurate to say that all things exist in God. If I look at a map of the universe, I can say God exists everywhere in the map, but it would be more appropriate to say that the map, paper and ink exist in God.

Why is this important? It means that God is above and before all and that I must live that way. In my practical reality, I tend to put myself first, the world second and God, a distant third. I know God is important, but frankly, His creation seems more real.

From the beginning of the Bible though, we are told that we cannot take God too seriously. To live as we were meant to live, we must continuously hold God above all. It is only in allowing God to be above all, that the rest of our world falls into its proper place. It is only when we realize that everything exists in God, that we can begin to have the intimate, all-encompassing relationship which He intended. In the beginning, God . . .


Authors Note: Since I started in 2016, this blog has been a walk-through of the New Testament. I have now worked through the New Testament and have been reworking some of the entries, but the time has come to move on to . . . The Old Testament. I am a little nervous about this. When I started this project, I had already read through the New Testament a couple of times in preparation for it and thus, already had many thoughts on what it had to say about my faith, life and addiction. The Old Testament however, seems less familiar. I have been putting the transition off for a while, but New Year’s Day seemed the appropriate time to begin, so, here goes.

One additional note: As I am always a work in progress, so is the blog. I have, for some time, been thinking of a name change for the blog. If any of you have any ideas or objections, let me know. I would love to hear your thoughts!




No Responses

  1. Dana Olson says:

    I saw this in the “About The Author” section, “I had sown the seeds of the flesh and had produced a crop of destruction…. ” Later in that entry is the mention of sowing the seeds of the spirit and reaping recovery, life and joy. You speak so much of reaping a new life in these posts that I think “The Seeds of the Spirit” is an excellent name for the blog. If you are at a certain point in your recovery that you are wanting to focus on, then a name change might be in order. Ultimately it is your call. Happy New Year!

  2. Larry says:

    “The Seeds of the Spirit” is good to continue with but it is your blog. I am just so thankful that you have been blessed to provide it to the rest of us that you can call it whatever you wish. It will not change the great content. Continued blessings to you, brother and to the New Yeat.

  3. Ted Fitzgerald says:

    I like the theme. (I like seeds) Don’t change it. Metaphorically, it takes on many meanings to many different readers… (My opinion) I think it describes what is happening early in the process and with some “gardening” ,”cultivating ” and some “spirit rain” it is probable what is going to happen next. (Which. I perceive, has already happened)

    I vote “No” to the rebrand idea – please submit to the editor.

  4. Kathy says:

    Good morning brother in Christ. As long as you continue to allow God to speak through you, the message will be relevant, thought provoking and conscience piercing. Old. Or new testament, new name or the same, it’s the message God places on your heart that ministers to so many of us. God’s deep blessing over you!

  5. Gwen Nelson says:

    I am just wondering what created a desire in you to think of a possible name change? What would that mean to you?

    • Scott says:

      I like the name. I like the concept of daily sowing the seeds of tomorrow. I just wonder if it does not mean much to others (is too obscure of reference?).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

thirteen − 10 =